Decision support
Qwen-Image-2.1 vs Uni-1.1
Compare canonical objects directly. The useful dimensions change with the object type, so model and hardware comparisons stay separate.
Luma AI
Benchmark results
Head to head on 2 benchmarks both models report
Qwen-Image-2.12leads
Uni-1.10leads
Arena Text to Image
Arena rating · Higher is better
Qwen-Image-2.1
Best1227+45 ahead · Arena #21CI 1220 to 1233
Uni-1.11182Arena #26CI 1177 to 1186
Runs and sources
Qwen-Image-2.1
- default122795% CI 1220 to 1233 · 17,883 votes
Uni-1.1- default118295% CI 1177 to 1186 · 58,725 votes
Arena Image Edit
Arena rating · Higher is better
Qwen-Image-2.1
Best1363+47 ahead · Arena #22CI 1357 to 1369
Uni-1.11316Arena #27CI 1313 to 1319
Runs and sources
Qwen-Image-2.1
- default136395% CI 1357 to 1369 · 38,085 votes
Uni-1.1- default131695% CI 1313 to 1319 · 238,334 votes
Each model's best published result is shown; "Not reported" means no matched evaluation, not a score of zero. Arena and DeepSWE ranks are the leaderboards' own; other ranks are among catalogue models with a score. Results from different harnesses or settings are not directly comparable.
Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.
Model specifications
API pricing · USD per 1M tokens
Capabilities and modalities
Architecture and availability
A dash means the field is not reported. Provider-specific performance and pricing may differ.