Decision support
QwQ 32B vs OLMo 2 32B
Compare canonical objects directly. The useful dimensions change with the object type, so model and hardware comparisons stay separate.
Ai2
Benchmark results
Arena Text
Arena rating · Higher is better
- QwQ 32B1336Arena #246CI 1331 to 1340
- OLMo 2 32BNot reported
Runs and sources
QwQ 32B- default133695% CI 1331 to 1340 · 25,166 votes
OLMo 2 32BNot reported
GPQA diamond
Best published score · Higher is better
- QwQ 32B65.3%#117 of 161
- OLMo 2 32BNot reported
Runs and sources
QwQ 32B- default65.3%
OLMo 2 32BNot reported
Source:Epoch AI evaluationOTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Best published score · Higher is better
- QwQ 32B59.2%#113 of 158
- OLMo 2 32BNot reported
Runs and sources
QwQ 32B- default59.2%
OLMo 2 32BNot reported
Source:Epoch AI evaluation
Each model's best published result is shown; "Not reported" means no matched evaluation, not a score of zero. Arena and DeepSWE ranks are the leaderboards' own; other ranks are among catalogue models with a score. Results from different harnesses or settings are not directly comparable.
Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.
Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.
Model specifications
API pricing · USD per 1M tokens
Capabilities and modalities
Architecture and availability
A dash means the field is not reported. Provider-specific performance and pricing may differ.