Decision support

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Compare canonical objects directly. The useful dimensions change with the object type, so model and hardware comparisons stay separate.

Benchmark results

  • DeepSWE 1.1

    Best pass@1 · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      63.4%
      #13 of 28
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • max63.4%mini-swe-agent · pass@4 85.0% · $0.48 / attempt
  • Arena Text

    Arena rating · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      1474
      Arena #40CI 1470 to 1479
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • default147495% CI 1470 to 1479 · 50,189 votes
  • Arena WebDev

    Arena rating · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      1609
      Arena #35CI 1603 to 1615
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • default160995% CI 1603 to 1615 · 23,554 votes
  • Arena Vision

    Arena rating · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      1272
      Arena #36CI 1266 to 1277
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • default127295% CI 1266 to 1277 · 31,530 votes
  • Agent Arena

    IPS score · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      -0.029
      Arena #39CI -0.037 to -0.022
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • default-0.02995% CI -0.037 to -0.022 · 13,770,186 observations
  • ARC-AGI-2

    Best published score · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      65.8%
      #28 of 85
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • low27.9%
    • high50.1%
    • max65.8%
    Source:External evaluation via Epoch AIOriginal-source terms apply
  • FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private

    Best published score · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      17.1%
      #51 of 72
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • max17.1%
  • FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private

    Best published score · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      55.8%
      #48 of 87
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • max55.8%
  • GPQA diamond

    Best published score · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      90.2%
      #43 of 161
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • max90.2%
  • OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

    Best published score · Higher is better

    • Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
      Not reported
    • GLM 5.3 Flash
      93.9%
      #46 of 158
    Runs and sources
    Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

    Not reported

    GLM 5.3 Flash
    • max93.9%

Each model's best published result is shown; "Not reported" means no matched evaluation, not a score of zero. Arena and DeepSWE ranks are the leaderboards' own; other ranks are among catalogue models with a score. Results from different harnesses or settings are not directly comparable.

Original-source terms apply to evaluations credited to their original publishers.

DeepSWE 1.1 results: official leaderboard, data generated 2026-09-22. Only exact model versions in the official dataset are matched.

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.

Model specifications

Release date
August 27, 2026
August 26, 2026
Context window
262K
1M
Native context
—
1M
Max output tokens
32,768
131,072
Knowledge cutoff
—
—
Open weights
Open weights
Open weights
Parameter count
127B
321B

API pricing · USD per 1M tokens

Input
$0.042
$0.0399
Output
$0.1232
$0.0784
Cached input
$0.0084
$0.03
Cache write
—
—

Capabilities and modalities

Input modalities
text
text, image, video
Output modalities
text
text
Tool calling
Supported
Supported
Reasoning option
Supported
Supported
Supported options
frequency_penalty, include_reasoning, logprobs, max_tokens, presence_penalty, reasoning, repetition_penalty, seed, stop, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_k, top_logprobs, top_p
frequency_penalty, include_reasoning, logit_bias, logprobs, max_tokens, min_p, parallel_tool_calls, presence_penalty, reasoning, reasoning_effort, repetition_penalty, response_format, seed, stop, structured_outputs, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_k, top_logprobs, top_p
Capabilities
—
completion, thinking, tools, vision

Architecture and availability

Architecture
—
glm5_next
Model families
—
glm5_next
Tokenizer
Other
Other
Instruction format
—
—
License
MIT
—
Providers
1
37
Provider endpoints
1
84
Ollama variants
0
0
Metadata source
ai-research
ai-research

A dash means the field is not reported. Provider-specific performance and pricing may differ.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.