Decision support
LFM2.5-2.6B vs GLM 5.3
Compare canonical objects directly. The useful dimensions change with the object type, so model and hardware comparisons stay separate.
Benchmark results
DeepSWE 1.1
Best pass@1 · Higher is better
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.369.0%#7 of 28
Runs and sources
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3- max69.0%mini-swe-agent · pass@4 87.6% · $3.99 / attempt
Arena Text
Arena rating · Higher is better
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.31483Arena #26CI 1478 to 1487
Runs and sources
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3- max148395% CI 1478 to 1487 · 31,017 votes
Arena WebDev
Arena rating · Higher is better
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.31622Arena #29CI 1615 to 1629
Runs and sources
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3- max162295% CI 1615 to 1629 · 12,605 votes
Agent Arena
IPS score · Higher is better
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3+0.010Arena #27CI +0.002 to +0.018
Runs and sources
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3- max+0.01095% CI +0.002 to +0.018 · 11,377,494 observations
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
Best published score · Higher is better
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.329.3%#35 of 72
Runs and sources
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3- max29.3%
Source:Epoch AI evaluationFrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Best published score · Higher is better
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.368.8%#30 of 87
Runs and sources
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3- max68.8%
Source:Epoch AI evaluationGPQA diamond
Best published score · Higher is better
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.390.9%#33 of 161
Runs and sources
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3- max90.9%
Source:Epoch AI evaluationOTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Best published score · Higher is better
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.391.1%#54 of 158
Runs and sources
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3- max91.1%
Source:Epoch AI evaluationSimpleQA Verified
Best published score · Higher is better
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.341.0%#50 of 87
Runs and sources
LFM2.5-2.6BNot reported
GLM 5.3- max41.0%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation
Each model's best published result is shown; "Not reported" means no matched evaluation, not a score of zero. Arena and DeepSWE ranks are the leaderboards' own; other ranks are among catalogue models with a score. Results from different harnesses or settings are not directly comparable.
DeepSWE 1.1 results: official leaderboard, data generated 2026-09-22. Only exact model versions in the official dataset are matched.
Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.
Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.
Model specifications
API pricing · USD per 1M tokens
Capabilities and modalities
Architecture and availability
A dash means the field is not reported. Provider-specific performance and pricing may differ.