Decision support
Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro vs Recraft V4
Compare canonical objects directly. The useful dimensions change with the object type, so model and hardware comparisons stay separate.
Benchmark results
Head to head on 1 benchmark both models report
Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro1lead- Recraft V40leads
Arena Text to Image
Arena rating · Higher is better
- Qwen-Image-2.0-ProBest1190+74 ahead · Arena #23CI 1184 to 1196
- Recraft V41116Arena #49CI 1113 to 1119
Runs and sources
Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro- default119095% CI 1184 to 1196 · 12,670 votes
Recraft V4- default111695% CI 1113 to 1119 · 152,609 votes
Arena Image Edit
Arena rating · Higher is better
- Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro1303Arena #29CI 1298 to 1307
- Recraft V4Not reported
Runs and sources
Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro- default130395% CI 1298 to 1307 · 54,662 votes
Recraft V4Not reported
Each model's best published result is shown; "Not reported" means no matched evaluation, not a score of zero. Arena and DeepSWE ranks are the leaderboards' own; other ranks are among catalogue models with a score. Results from different harnesses or settings are not directly comparable.
Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.
Model specifications
API pricing · USD per 1M tokens
Capabilities and modalities
Architecture and availability
A dash means the field is not reported. Provider-specific performance and pricing may differ.