GPT-6 Astra launch post cover

Cost/1M tokens

input
$10.00
cached
$1.00
output
$50.00
cache write
$12.50
Context
1.1Mtokens
Released
2mo ago

Benchmarks

DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.

How it ranks

Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.

DeepSWE 1.1

Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better

#1 of 28

Arena Text

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #41

  1. 1504
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  2. 1503
    Claude Opus 4.6Similar price
  3. 1503
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  4. 1485
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  5. 1475
  6. 1474
    GLM 5.3 FlashNearby rank
  7. 1474
    GPT-6 Astra
  8. 1474
    Claude Opus 4.5Nearby rank
  9. 1473
    GPT-5.5 InstantNearby rank
  10. 1450
    Claude Opus 4.1Similar price

-11 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena WebDev

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #5

  1. 1836
    Claude Fable 5.2Similar price
  2. 1773
  3. 1768
    Gemini 4 CarbonNearby rank
  4. 1764
    GPT-6 Astra
  5. 1743
    GPT-6.1 SolNearby rank
  6. 1742
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  7. 1625
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  8. 1615
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  9. 1389
    Claude Opus 4.1Similar price

+149 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Vision

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #21

  1. 1309
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  2. 1300
    Claude Opus 4.7Similar price
  3. 1299
    Claude Opus 4.6Similar price
  4. 1289
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  5. 1288
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  6. 1285
    Claude Opus 5Nearby rank
  7. 1285
    GPT-5.5Nearby rank
  8. 1283
    GPT-6 Astra
  9. 1282
    GPT-5.4Nearby rank
  10. 1281
    Gemini 3.5 FlashNearby rank

Level with GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor, overlapping 95% CIs) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Search

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #3

  1. 1255
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  2. 1248
    GPT-6.1 SolNearby rank
  3. 1245
    GPT-6 Astra
  4. 1229
    GPT-6 SolNearby rank
  5. 1229
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  6. 1227
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  7. 1213
    Claude Opus 5Similar price
  8. 1210
    Claude Opus 4.7Similar price

Level with GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor, overlapping 95% CIs) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Document

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #17

  1. 1500
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  2. 1498
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  3. 1497
    Claude Opus 4.6Similar price
  4. 1494
    Claude Opus 4.7Similar price
  5. 1486
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  6. 1474
    GPT-5.6 TerraNearby rank
  7. 1474
    Muse Spark 1.3Nearby rank
  8. 1474
    GPT-6 Astra
  9. 1471
    GPT-5.4Nearby rank
  10. 1469
    Gemini 3.8 FlashNearby rank

Level with GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor, overlapping 95% CIs) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Agent Arena

Best IPS score per model · Higher is better

Arena #6

  1. +0.304
    Claude Fable 5.2Similar price
  2. +0.160
  3. +0.148
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  4. +0.145
    GPT-6 Astra
  5. +0.125
    GPT-6.1 SolNearby rank
  6. +0.120
    GPT-6.1 TerraNearby rank
  7. +0.073
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  8. +0.072
    Claude Opus 5Similar price
  9. +0.046
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor

+0.099 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

ARC-AGI-2

Best score per model · Higher is better

#1 of 85

  1. 95.0%
    GPT-6 Astra
  2. 94.2%
    Gemini 4 CarbonNearby rank
  3. 94.2%
    GPT-6.1 SolNearby rank
  4. 93.8%
    Claude Fable 5.2Similar price
  5. 92.5%
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  6. 90.0%
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  7. 89.2%
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  8. 88.3%
    Claude Opus 5Similar price

+2.5 pts vs GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#3 of 72

  1. 100.0%
    Claude Fable 5.2Similar price
  2. 100.0%
    GPT-6.1 SolNearby rank
  3. 97.6%
    GPT-6 Astra
  4. 95.1%
    Gemini 4 CarbonNearby rank
  5. 95.0%
    Claude Opus 5.5Nearby rank
  6. 90.2%
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  7. 87.8%
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  8. 82.9%
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  9. 2.4%
    Claude Opus 4.1Similar price

+14.7 pts vs GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#2 of 87

  1. 95.1%
    Claude Fable 5.2Similar price
  2. 93.7%
    GPT-6 Astra
  3. 93.7%
    GPT-6.1 SolNearby rank
  4. 91.2%
    Claude Opus 5.5Nearby rank
  5. 90.2%
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  6. 89.1%
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  7. 87.0%
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  8. 12.6%
    Claude Opus 4.1Similar price

+4.6 pts vs GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

GPQA diamond

Best score per model · Higher is better

#3 of 161

  1. 96.5%
    Gemini 4 CarbonNearby rank
  2. 96.4%
    Gemini 4 ArgonNearby rank
  3. 95.8%
    GPT-6 Astra
  4. 95.6%
  5. 95.4%
    Gemini 3.8 FlashNearby rank
  6. 93.9%
    Claude Fable 5.2Similar price
  7. 93.9%
    Claude Opus 5Similar price
  8. 93.5%
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  9. 85.9%
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  10. 77.3%
    Claude Opus 4.1Similar price

+2.3 pts vs GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models

Humanity's Last Exam

Best score per model · Higher is better

#1 of 34

  1. 54.8%
    GPT-6 Astra
  2. 46.5%
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  3. 46.4%
  4. 36.2%
    GPT-5.4Earlier version
  5. 36.2%
    Claude Opus 4.7Similar price
  6. 34.4%
    Claude Opus 4.6Similar price
  7. 7.9%
    Claude Opus 4.1Similar price

+18.6 pts vs GPT-5.4 (earlier version) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models

OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

Best score per model · Higher is better

#1 of 158

  1. 100.0%
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  2. 100.0%
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  3. 100.0%
    Gemini 4 CarbonNearby rank
  4. 100.0%
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  5. 100.0%
    GPT-6 Astra
  6. 100.0%
    GPT-6 SolNearby rank
  7. 100.0%
    GPT-6.1 SolNearby rank
  8. 99.7%
    Claude Fable 5.2Similar price
  9. 68.9%
    Claude Opus 4.1Similar price

Level with GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

SimpleQA Verified

Best score per model · Higher is better

#4 of 87

  1. 94.0%
    Claude Fable 5.2Similar price
  2. 77.7%
    Gemini 4 CarbonNearby rank
  3. 76.0%
    Gemini 4 ArgonNearby rank
  4. 75.6%
    GPT-6 Astra
  5. 73.9%
    GPT-6.1 SolNearby rank
  6. 73.5%
  7. 70.8%
    Claude Fable 5.1Similar price
  8. 70.7%
    Claude Fable 5Similar price
  9. 69.7%
    GPT-5.6 SolPredecessor
  10. 59.9%
    Claude Opus 5Similar price

+5.9 pts vs GPT-5.6 Sol (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

DeepSWE 1.1

Primary coding-agent benchmark · 113 tasks · Data generated 2026-09-22

Official leaderboard
74.1%
pass@1 · highest published configuration
mini-swe-agent · xhigh reasoning
pass@4
80.5%
Average cost / attempt
$4.43
Benchmark runs
4

Score vs cost by reasoning effort

Average cost per attempt (USD) against pass rate

All published configurations

Harness / reasoningpass@1pass@4Cost / attempt
mini-swe-agent · xhigh74.1%80.5%$4.43
mini-swe-agent · high73.2%82.3%$3.92
mini-swe-agent · max73.2%79.6%$7.50
mini-swe-agent · medium72.8%82.3%$3.08
mini-swe-agent · low67.0%79.6%$1.60

pass@1 is the success rate across scored attempts; pass@4 is the share of tasks solved in at least one of four attempts. Costs are reported by DeepSWE for each configuration. These results are not directly comparable to evaluations using different harnesses. Official source JSON.

Reasoning effort

ARC-AGI-2

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

All published scores

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.