GPT-6 Luna launch post cover

Cost/1M tokens

input
$0.10
cached
$0.01
output
$0.50
cache write
$0.125
Context
1.1Mtokens
Released
1mo ago

Benchmarks

DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.

How it ranks

Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.

DeepSWE 1.1

Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1

Arena Text

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #98

  1. 1453
    GPT-5.6 LunaPredecessor
  2. 1452
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price
  3. 1448
    MiMo-V2.6-FlashSimilar price
  4. 1441
  5. 1441
    GLM 4.7Nearby rank
  6. 1441
    GPT-6 Luna
  7. 1437
    Gemma 4 26B A4BNearby rank
  8. 1437
    GPT-5.2Nearby rank
  9. 1422
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  10. 1326
    Qwen3 30B A3BSimilar price

-12 vs GPT-5.6 Luna (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena WebDev

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #45

  1. 1638
    MiMo-V2.6-FlashSimilar price
  2. 1609
    Muse EmberSimilar price
  3. 1594
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  4. 1582
  5. 1581
  6. 1577
    GPT-6 Luna
  7. 1573
    Step 5 PreviewNearby rank
  8. 1564
    Mistral Large 4Nearby rank
  9. 1519
    GPT-5.6 LunaPredecessor
  10. 1370
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price

+58 vs GPT-5.6 Luna (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Vision

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #68

  1. 1265
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price
  2. 1255
    GPT-5.6 LunaPredecessor
  3. 1248
    MiMo-V2.6-FlashSimilar price
  4. 1242
    Gemma 4 26B A4BNearby rank
  5. 1242
    Grok 4.3Nearby rank
  6. 1235
    GPT-6 Luna
  7. 1235
  8. 1234
    MiMo-V2.5Nearby rank
  9. 1128
    Llama 4 ScoutSimilar price
  10. 1019
    Nova Lite 1.0Similar price

-20 vs GPT-5.6 Luna (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Search

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #12

  1. 1213
    Claude Opus 5Nearby rank
  2. 1213
    Claude Opus 5.5Nearby rank
  3. 1211
    GPT-6 Luna
  4. 1210
    Claude Opus 4.7Nearby rank
  5. 1205
    Grok 4.5Nearby rank

Arena Document

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Document yet

Agent Arena

Best IPS score per model · Higher is better

Arena #26

  1. +0.020
  2. +0.018
    Muse WonderNearby rank
  3. +0.017
    Muse EmberSimilar price
  4. +0.016
    GPT-6 Luna
  5. +0.010
    GLM 5.3Nearby rank
  6. +0.006
    Kimi K3Nearby rank
  7. +0.005
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  8. -0.000
    MiMo-V2.6-FlashSimilar price

Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

ARC-AGI-2

Best score per model · Higher is better

#39 of 85

  1. 78.1%
  2. 61.3%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  3. 60.4%
    Kimi K3Nearby rank
  4. 59.5%
    GPT-5.6 LunaPredecessor
  5. 59.3%
    GPT-6 Luna
  6. 54.2%
    GPT-5.2 ProNearby rank
  7. 52.9%
    GPT-5.2Nearby rank
  8. 1.3%
  9. 0.0%
    Llama 4 ScoutSimilar price

-0.2 pts vs GPT-5.6 Luna (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#20 of 72

  1. 61.0%
    GPT-5.6 LunaPredecessor
  2. 58.5%
    GPT-5.4 ProNearby rank
  3. 56.1%
    Claude Opus 4.8Nearby rank
  4. 56.1%
    GPT-6 Luna
  5. 49.0%
    GPT-5.4Nearby rank
  6. 46.3%
    Qwen3.8 MaxNearby rank
  7. 46.3%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  8. 46.3%
  9. 24.4%
  10. 2.4%
    GPT-5 NanoSimilar price

-4.9 pts vs GPT-5.6 Luna (predecessor) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#20 of 87

  1. 82.1%
    GPT-5.6 LunaPredecessor
  2. 80.0%
    Claude Opus 4.8Nearby rank
  3. 78.9%
    GPT-6 Luna
  4. 78.6%
    GPT-5.4Nearby rank
  5. 75.1%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  6. 71.2%
  7. 20.4%
    Qwen3.6 35B A3BSimilar price
  8. 18.2%
    Qwen3.5-FlashSimilar price

-3.2 pts vs GPT-5.6 Luna (predecessor) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models

GPQA diamond

Best score per model · Higher is better

#42 of 161

  1. 93.2%
  2. 91.6%
    GPT-5.6 LunaPredecessor
  3. 90.5%
    Claude Opus 4.6Nearby rank
  4. 90.5%
    Claude Sonnet 5Nearby rank
  5. 90.5%
    GPT-6 Luna
  6. 90.2%
    Claude Opus 4.7Nearby rank
  7. 90.2%
    GLM 5.3 FlashNearby rank
  8. 89.6%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  9. 75.8%
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price
  10. 61.7%
    Qwen3 30B A3BSimilar price

-1.1 pts vs GPT-5.6 Luna (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

Best score per model · Higher is better

#19 of 158

  1. 99.4%
  2. 98.9%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  3. 98.9%
    Claude Opus 5Nearby rank
  4. 98.9%
    Gemini 3.8 FlashNearby rank
  5. 98.9%
    GPT-6 Luna
  6. 98.6%
  7. 98.3%
    Claude Opus 4.8Nearby rank
  8. 98.3%
    GPT-5.6 LunaPredecessor
  9. 73.3%
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price
  10. 62.8%
    Qwen3 30B A3BSimilar price

+0.6 pts vs GPT-5.6 Luna (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

SimpleQA Verified

Best score per model · Higher is better

#49 of 87

  1. 42.9%
  2. 42.5%
  3. 41.4%
    GPT-6 Luna
  4. 41.0%
    GPT-5.6 LunaPredecessor
  5. 41.0%
    GLM 5.3Nearby rank
  6. 23.8%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  7. 20.3%
    Qwen3.5-FlashSimilar price
  8. 10.4%
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price

+0.4 pts vs GPT-5.6 Luna (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1 as of 2026-09-22. Results are only shown for exact model versions in the official dataset. Official leaderboard.

Reasoning effort

Agent Arena

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

ARC-AGI-2

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

All published scores

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.