- input
- $0.05
- cached
- $0.005
- output
- $0.40
- Context
- 400Ktokens
- Released
- 1y ago
Cost/1M tokens
Benchmarks
DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.
How it ranks
Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.
DeepSWE 1.1
Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better
Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1
Arena Text
Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better
Arena #241
- 1454
Hy3Similar price - 1437
Gemma 4 26B A4BSimilar price - 1364
GLM 4.7 FlashSimilar price - 1347
Qwen3 32BSimilar price - 1343
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5Nearby rank - 1342
Gemma 3 12BNearby rank - 1338
GPT-5 Nano - 1336
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Nearby rank - 1336QwQ 32BNearby rank
- 1322
GPT-4.1 NanoPredecessor
+15 vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models
Arena WebDev
Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better
Not ranked on Arena WebDev yet
Arena Vision
Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better
Arena #120
- 1248
MiMo-V2.6-FlashSimilar price - 1242
Gemma 4 26B A4BSimilar price - 1155
Mistral Medium 3Nearby rank - 1153
GLM 4.5VNearby rank - 1147
GPT-5 Nano - 1145
Llama 4 MaverickNearby rank - 1140
Mistral Small 3.2Nearby rank - 1128
Llama 4 ScoutSimilar price - 1089
GPT-4.1 NanoPredecessor - 1019
Nova Lite 1.0Similar price
+59 vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models
Arena Search
Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better
Not ranked on Arena Search yet
Arena Document
Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better
Not ranked on Arena Document yet
Agent Arena
Best IPS score per model · Higher is better
Not ranked on Agent Arena yet
ARC-AGI-2
Best score per model · Higher is better
#70 of 85
- 78.1%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Similar price - 61.4%
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Similar price - 61.3%
Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price - 4.0%
Claude Haiku 4.5Nearby rank - 4.0%
DeepSeek V3.2Nearby rank - 2.6%
GPT-5 Nano - 2.5%
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20Nearby rank - 1.3%
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewNearby rank - 0.0%
Llama 4 ScoutSimilar price - 0.0%
GPT-4.1 NanoPredecessor
+2.6 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Best score per model · Higher is better
#34 of 58
- 10.3%
Qwen3.6 FlashNearby rank - 8.5%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Nearby rank - 8.3%
GPT-5 Nano - 7.2%
Claude Opus 4.1Nearby rank - 6.2%
Qwen3.5-FlashSimilar price - 1.0%
GPT-4.1 NanoPredecessor - 0.0%
Llama 4 ScoutSimilar price
+7.2 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 2 similarly priced models
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
Best score per model · Higher is better
#32 of 46
- 2.1%
Claude Haiku 4.5Nearby rank - 2.1%
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Nearby rank - 2.1%
GPT-5 Nano - 2.1%
o3Nearby rank - 2.1%
GPT-5.4 MiniNearby rank - 0.0%
Qwen3.5-FlashSimilar price
Ahead of 1 of 1 similarly priced model
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
Best score per model · Higher is better
#64 of 72
- 56.1%
GPT-6 LunaSimilar price - 46.3%
Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price - 46.3%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Similar price - 24.4%
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Similar price - 2.4%
Claude Sonnet 4.5Nearby rank - 2.4%
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Nearby rank - 2.4%
GPT-5 Nano - 2.4%
GPT-5.5 InstantNearby rank - 0.0%
Gemini 2.5 ProNearby rank
Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Best score per model · Higher is better
#78 of 87
- 75.1%
Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price - 71.2%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Similar price - 57.5%
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Similar price - 22.5%
Qwen3.6 FlashNearby rank - 20.4%
Qwen3.6 35B A3BNearby rank - 20.0%
GPT-5 Nano - 19.3%
Qwen3.7 FlashNearby rank - 18.9%Qwen3 MaxNearby rank
- 18.2%
Qwen3.5-FlashSimilar price
Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models
GPQA diamond
Best score per model · Higher is better
#111 of 161
- 73.2%
Gemma 4 26B A4BSimilar price - 71.2%
DeepSeek V3Nearby rank - 70.7%Qwen3 235B-A22BNearby rank
- 69.4%
GPT-5 Nano - 67.6%
DeepSeek V3 0324Nearby rank - 66.9%
GPT-4.1Nearby rank - 65.7%
Qwen3 32BSimilar price - 60.5%
GLM 4.7 FlashSimilar price - 51.8%
Llama 4 ScoutSimilar price - 48.9%
GPT-4.1 NanoPredecessor
+20.5 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Best score per model · Higher is better
#84 of 158
- 83.1%
Kimi K2 Thinking TurboNearby rank - 82.2%
Gemma 4 26B A4BSimilar price - 81.1%
GPT-5 Nano - 80.0%
Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteNearby rank - 80.0%
GLM 5Nearby rank - 66.9%
Qwen3 32BSimilar price - 58.3%
GLM 4.7 FlashSimilar price - 28.9%
GPT-4.1 NanoPredecessor - 7.8%
Llama 4 ScoutSimilar price
+52.2 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models
SimpleQA Verified
Best score per model · Higher is better
#83 of 87
- 33.6%
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Similar price - 23.8%
Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price - 20.3%
Qwen3.5-FlashSimilar price - 13.2%
Claude Haiku 4.5Nearby rank - 12.7%
GPT-4.1 MiniNearby rank - 11.7%
GPT-5 Nano - 11.7%
GPT-5.4 NanoNearby rank - 10.4%
Gemma 4 31BSimilar price - 6.0%
GPT-4.1 NanoPredecessor
+5.7 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models
Terminal Bench
Best score per model · Higher is better
#45 of 49
- 24.6%
Qwen3.6 35B A3BNearby rank - 24.5%
GLM 4.6Nearby rank - 21.8%
GPT-5 Nano - 18.7%
gpt-oss-120bSimilar price - 17.1%
Gemini 2.5 FlashNearby rank - 9.2%
Qwen3.5-9BSimilar price
Ahead of 2 of 2 similarly priced models
Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1 as of 2026-09-22. Results are only shown for exact model versions in the official dataset. Official leaderboard.
Reasoning effort
ARC-AGI-2
Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better
GPQA diamond
Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better
Terminal Bench
Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better
All published scores
- Arena TextArena #2411338
+15 vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor)
- high133895% CI 1331 to 1345 · 8,126 votes
- Arena VisionArena #1201147
+59 vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor)
- high114795% CI 1136 to 1159 · 3,921 votes
- ARC-AGI-2#70 of 852.6%
+2.6 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor)
- minimal0.0%
- low0.0%
- medium0.9%
- high2.6%
- FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private#34 of 588.3%
+7.2 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor)
- medium7.2%
- high8.3%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private#32 of 462.1%
- medium2.1%
- high0.0%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private#64 of 722.4%
- high2.4%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private#78 of 8720.0%
- minimal1.8%
- low6.0%
- high20.0%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - GPQA diamond#111 of 16169.4%
+20.5 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor)
- minimal48.5%
- low57.6%
- medium67.4%
- high69.4%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025#84 of 15881.1%
+52.2 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor)
- minimal35.6%
- low46.7%
- medium74.2%
- high81.1%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - SimpleQA Verified#83 of 8711.7%
+5.7 pts vs GPT-4.1 Nano (predecessor)
- high11.7%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - Terminal Bench#45 of 4921.8%
- medium11.5%Codex CLITerminal-Bench v2 LeaderboardOriginal-source terms apply
- medium9.9%OpenHandsTerminal-Bench v2 LeaderboardOriginal-source terms apply
- medium7.9%Terminus 2Terminal-Bench v2 LeaderboardOriginal-source terms apply
- medium7.0%Mini-SWE-AgentTerminal-Bench v2 LeaderboardOriginal-source terms apply
- unknown21.8%spoox-o-mhttps://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0Original-source terms apply
- unknown11.5%Codex CLIhttps://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0Original-source terms apply
- unknown9.9%OpenHandshttps://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0Original-source terms apply
- unknown7.9%Terminus 2https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0Original-source terms apply
- unknown7.0%Mini-SWE-Agenthttps://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0Original-source terms apply
Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.
Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.