Gemini 2.5 Flash launch post cover

Cost/1M tokens

input
$0.30
cached
$0.03
output
$2.50
cache write
$0.0833
Context
1Mtokens
Released
1y ago

Benchmarks

DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.

How it ranks

Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.

DeepSWE 1.1

Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1

Arena Text

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #156

  1. 1467
    MiMo-V2.5-ProSimilar price
  2. 1424
    GLM 4.6Similar price
  3. 1412
    Inkling 2 SmallNearby rank
  4. 1411
    GLM 4.5Nearby rank
  5. 1409
    Gemini 2.5 Flash
  6. 1409
    Hy3 previewNearby rank
  7. 1409
    Qwen3.5-27BSimilar price
  8. 1360
    Gemini 2.0 FlashPredecessor
  9. 1335
    Nova 2 LiteSimilar price

+49 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena WebDev

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena WebDev yet

Arena Vision

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #83

  1. 1234
    MiMo-V2.5Similar price
  2. 1216
    Qwen3.5-27BNearby rank
  3. 1216
    o3Nearby rank
  4. 1215
    Gemini 2.5 Flash
  5. 1214
  6. 1214
    GPT-4.1Nearby rank
  7. 1172
    Gemini 2.0 FlashPredecessor
  8. 1160
    Mistral Medium 3.1Similar price
  9. 1153
    GLM 4.5VSimilar price
  10. 1121

+43 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Search

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Search yet

Arena Document

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Document yet

Agent Arena

Best IPS score per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Agent Arena yet

FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#41 of 58

  1. 26.2%
    Qwen3.6 PlusSimilar price
  2. 5.9%
    Claude Haiku 4.5Nearby rank
  3. 5.5%
    GPT-4.1Nearby rank
  4. 4.8%
    Gemini 2.5 Flash
  5. 4.5%
    Claude Opus 4Nearby rank
  6. 4.5%
    GPT-4.1 MiniSimilar price
  7. 3.8%
    GLM 4.6Similar price
  8. 0.3%
    Mistral Medium 3Similar price

Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#18 of 46

  1. 8.3%
    Qwen3.6 PlusSimilar price
  2. 6.3%
    GPT-5 MiniSimilar price
  3. 4.2%
    Claude Opus 4.5Nearby rank
  4. 4.2%
  5. 4.2%
    Gemini 2.5 Flash
  6. 4.2%
    Gemini 2.5 ProNearby rank
  7. 4.2%
  8. 2.1%
    GLM 4.6Similar price
  9. 0.0%
    Kimi K2 ThinkingSimilar price

Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

Terminal Bench

Best score per model · Higher is better

#47 of 49

  1. 61.6%
    GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniSimilar price
  2. 43.2%
    Kimi K2.5Similar price
  3. 42.7%
    MiniMax M2.5Similar price
  4. 24.5%
    GLM 4.6Similar price
  5. 21.8%
    GPT-5 NanoNearby rank
  6. 18.7%
    gpt-oss-120bNearby rank
  7. 17.1%
    Gemini 2.5 Flash
  8. 9.2%
    Qwen3.5-9BNearby rank
  9. 3.4%
    gpt-oss-20bNearby rank

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1 as of 2026-09-22. Results are only shown for exact model versions in the official dataset. Official leaderboard.

All published scores

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.