- input
- $0.325
- output
- $1.95
- cache write
- $0.4063
- Context
- 1Mtokens
- Released
- 7mo ago
Cost/1M tokens
Benchmarks
DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.
How it ranks
Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.
DeepSWE 1.1
Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better
Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1
Arena Text
Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better
Arena #92
- 1446
Gemini 2.5 ProNearby rank - 1443
InklingNearby rank - 1443
Qwen3.6 Plus - 1442
Grok 4.7Nearby rank - 1442
Grok 4.3Nearby rank - 1434
MiMo-V2.5Similar price - 1415
Mistral Large 3 2512Similar price - 1396
Qwen3.5-FlashEarlier version - 1383
GPT-4.1 MiniSimilar price - 1293
Llama 3.1 70B InstructSimilar price
+47 vs Qwen3.5-Flash (earlier version) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models
Arena WebDev
Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better
Arena #81
- 1474
Kimi K2.7 CodeNearby rank - 1462
GPT-5.4Nearby rank - 1461
Qwen3.6 Plus - 1448
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Nearby rank - 1446
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNearby rank - 1438
MiMo-V2.5Similar price - 1408
Inkling SmallSimilar price - 1245
GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniSimilar price - 1244
Qwen3.5-FlashEarlier version - 1233
Mistral Large 3 2512Similar price
+218 vs Qwen3.5-Flash (earlier version) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models
Arena Vision
Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better
Not ranked on Arena Vision yet
Arena Search
Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better
Not ranked on Arena Search yet
Agent Arena
Best IPS score per model · Higher is better
Not ranked on Agent Arena yet
FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
Best score per model · Higher is better
#18 of 58
- 28.3%
GPT-5.4 MiniNearby rank - 27.2%
GPT-5 MiniNearby rank - 26.2%
Qwen3.6 Plus - 25.9%
GPT-5.4 NanoNearby rank - 23.1%Qwen3.6 Max PreviewNearby rank
- 21.0%Qwen3.5 PlusPredecessor
- 4.8%
Gemini 2.5 FlashSimilar price - 4.5%
GPT-4.1 MiniSimilar price - 3.8%
GLM 4.6Similar price - 0.3%
Mistral Medium 3Similar price
+5.2 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models
FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
Best score per model · Higher is better
#14 of 46
- 12.5%
GPT-5.1Nearby rank - 12.5%
GLM 5.1Nearby rank - 8.3%
Qwen3.6 Plus - 8.3%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Nearby rank - 6.3%
GPT-5 MiniSimilar price - 4.2%
Gemini 2.5 FlashSimilar price - 2.1%
GLM 4.6Similar price - 2.1%Qwen3.5 PlusPredecessor
- 0.0%
Kimi K2 ThinkingSimilar price
+6.3 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
Best score per model · Higher is better
#61 of 87
- 67.4%
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSimilar price - 46.3%
Inkling SmallSimilar price - 44.9%
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)Nearby rank - 42.8%
Grok 4.3Nearby rank - 38.2%
Qwen3.6 Plus - 36.8%
GLM 5.1Nearby rank - 35.1%
Qwen3.6 27BNearby rank - 26.0%
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteSimilar price - 18.2%
Qwen3.5-FlashEarlier version - 6.7%
GPT-4.1 MiniSimilar price
+20.0 pts vs Qwen3.5-Flash (earlier version) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models
GPQA diamond
Best score per model · Higher is better
#52 of 161
- 88.8%
Grok 4.3Nearby rank - 88.5%
Inkling SmallNearby rank - 88.4%
Qwen3.6 Plus - 88.3%
InklingNearby rank - 88.1%
Mistral Large 4Nearby rank - 84.8%Qwen3.5 PlusPredecessor
- 65.8%
GPT-4.1 MiniSimilar price - 59.5%
Mistral Medium 3Similar price - 44.2%
Llama 3.1 70B InstructSimilar price - 36.5%
Gemma 2 27BSimilar price
+3.5 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Best score per model · Higher is better
#47 of 158
- 94.2%
Gemini 3.6 FlashNearby rank - 93.9%
GLM 5.3 FlashNearby rank - 93.3%
Qwen3.6 Plus - 93.3%
Qwen3.7 PlusNearby rank - 93.3%
Grok 4.3Nearby rank - 86.7%Qwen3.5 PlusPredecessor
- 44.7%
GPT-4.1 MiniSimilar price - 32.2%
Mistral Medium 3Similar price - 3.6%
Llama 3.1 70B InstructSimilar price - 1.4%
Gemma 2 27BSimilar price
+6.7 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models
SimpleQA Verified
Best score per model · Higher is better
#45 of 87
- 45.7%
Claude Opus 4.5Nearby rank - 45.1%
GPT-5.4Nearby rank - 44.1%
Qwen3.6 Plus - 43.2%
GPT-5.6 TerraNearby rank - 42.9%
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashNearby rank - 34.3%
Kimi K2.5Similar price - 32.2%
GLM 4.7Similar price - 25.4%Qwen3.5 PlusPredecessor
- 19.1%
Inkling SmallSimilar price - 12.7%
GPT-4.1 MiniSimilar price
+18.8 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor) · Ahead of 4 of 4 similarly priced models
SWE-bench Verified
Best score per model · Higher is better
#32 of 35
- 77.6%
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Similar price - 75.4%
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewSimilar price - 73.8%
Kimi K2.5Similar price - 64.7%
GPT-5 MiniSimilar price - 62.3%
o3Nearby rank - 61.0%
Claude Sonnet 3.7Nearby rank - 57.9%
Qwen3.6 Plus - 57.6%
Gemini 2.5 ProNearby rank - 48.5%
GPT-4.1Nearby rank
Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models
Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1 as of 2026-09-22. Results are only shown for exact model versions in the official dataset. Official leaderboard.
All published scores
- Arena TextArena #921443
+47 vs Qwen3.5-Flash (earlier version)
- default144395% CI 1439 to 1447 · 47,601 votes
- Arena WebDevArena #811461
+218 vs Qwen3.5-Flash (earlier version)
- default146195% CI 1456 to 1467 · 18,263 votes
- FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private#18 of 5826.2%
+5.2 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor)
- default26.2%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private#14 of 468.3%
+6.3 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor)
- default8.3%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private#61 of 8738.2%
+20.0 pts vs Qwen3.5-Flash (earlier version)
- none32.3%
- default38.2%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - GPQA diamond#52 of 16188.4%
+3.5 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor)
- default88.4%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025#47 of 15893.3%
+6.7 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor)
- default93.3%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - SimpleQA Verified#45 of 8744.1%
+18.8 pts vs Qwen3.5 Plus (predecessor)
- default44.1%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation - SWE-bench Verified#32 of 3557.9%
- default57.9%
Source:Epoch AI evaluation
Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.
Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.