Grok 4.7 launch post cover

Cost/1M tokens

input
$2.00
cached
$0.50
output
$6.00
Context
500Ktokens
Released
1mo ago

Benchmarks

DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.

How it ranks

Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.

DeepSWE 1.1

Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1

Arena Text

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #94

  1. 1483
    Kimi K3.1 ProSimilar price
  2. 1478
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  3. 1456
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  4. 1455
    GPT-5.1Similar price
  5. 1443
    InklingNearby rank
  6. 1443
    Qwen3.6 PlusNearby rank
  7. 1442
    Grok 4.7
  8. 1442
    Grok 4.3Nearby rank
  9. 1441
  10. 1427
    Mistral Medium 3.5Similar price

-15 vs Grok 4.6 (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena WebDev

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #23

  1. 1676
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  2. 1649
    Muse WonderNearby rank
  3. 1646
    Inkling 2 SmallNearby rank
  4. 1641
    Grok 4.7
  5. 1638
    MiMo-V2.6-FlashNearby rank
  6. 1632
    Hy4 previewNearby rank
  7. 1618
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  8. 1500
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  9. 1417
    GPT-5Similar price
  10. 1263
    Mistral Medium 3.5Similar price

+23 vs Grok 4.6 (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Vision

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #55

  1. 1281
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  2. 1263
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  3. 1263
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  4. 1251
    GPT-5.1Similar price
  5. 1250
    GPT-5.4 MiniNearby rank
  6. 1249
    Grok 4.7
  7. 1248
    MiMo-V2.6-FlashNearby rank
  8. 1247
    Gemini 2.5 ProNearby rank
  9. 1199
    Mistral Medium 3.5Similar price

Level with Grok 4.6 (predecessor, overlapping 95% CIs) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Search

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Search yet

Arena Document

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Document yet

Agent Arena

Best IPS score per model · Higher is better

Arena #17

  1. +0.170
    Gemini 4 CarbonSimilar price
  2. +0.160
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  3. +0.049
    Kimi K3.1 ProSimilar price
  4. +0.046
    GPT-5.6 SolNearby rank
  5. +0.026
    Grok 4.7
  6. +0.025
    Inkling 2 SmallNearby rank
  7. +0.024
    MiMo-V2.6-ProNearby rank
  8. -0.002
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  9. -0.137
    Mistral Medium 3.5Similar price

+0.027 vs Grok 4.6 (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

ARC-AGI-2

Best score per model · Higher is better

#31 of 85

  1. 83.9%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 72.1%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  3. 67.1%
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  4. 64.6%
    Claude Opus 4.6Nearby rank
  5. 61.4%
  6. 61.4%
    Grok 4.7
  7. 61.3%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Nearby rank
  8. 61.3%
  9. 60.4%
    Kimi K3Similar price
  10. 17.6%
    GPT-5.1Similar price

-5.7 pts vs Grok 4.6 (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#51 of 72

  1. 80.5%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 34.1%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  3. 31.7%
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  4. 26.8%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  5. 22.0%
    GPT-5Similar price
  6. 17.1%
  7. 17.1%
    Inkling SmallNearby rank
  8. 17.1%
    Grok 4.7
  9. 17.1%
  10. 17.1%
    GLM 5.3 FlashNearby rank

-14.6 pts vs Grok 4.6 (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#52 of 87

  1. 88.8%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 66.0%
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  3. 65.6%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  4. 62.8%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  5. 55.4%
    GPT-5Similar price
  6. 54.0%
    Kimi K2.7 CodeNearby rank
  7. 53.0%
    Grok 4.7
  8. 51.2%
  9. 51.2%
    GPT-5.4 MiniNearby rank

-13.0 pts vs Grok 4.6 (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

GPQA diamond

Best score per model · Higher is better

#23 of 161

  1. 94.0%
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  2. 93.1%
    Kimi K3Nearby rank
  3. 92.8%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  4. 92.7%
    Grok 4.7
  5. 92.7%
    Qwen3.8 MaxNearby rank
  6. 92.6%
  7. 92.3%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  8. 87.6%
    GPT-5.1Similar price
  9. 49.0%
    Mistral Large 2407Similar price

-1.3 pts vs Grok 4.6 (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

Best score per model · Higher is better

#28 of 158

  1. 100.0%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  2. 99.2%
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  3. 98.3%
    Mistral Large 4Nearby rank
  4. 98.3%
    GPT-5.6 LunaNearby rank
  5. 98.1%
    Grok 4.7
  6. 97.8%
    Claude Opus 4.7Nearby rank
  7. 97.8%
    GPT-5.4Nearby rank
  8. 95.6%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  9. 91.4%
    GPT-5Similar price
  10. 8.5%
    Mistral Large 2407Similar price

-1.1 pts vs Grok 4.6 (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

SimpleQA Verified

Best score per model · Higher is better

#22 of 87

  1. 66.2%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  2. 57.8%
    Muse Spark 1.1Nearby rank
  3. 57.3%
    GPT-6.1 TerraNearby rank
  4. 56.0%
    Grok 4.7
  5. 55.8%
    Qwen3.7 MaxNearby rank
  6. 53.0%
    Claude Opus 4.8Nearby rank
  7. 50.1%
    GPT-5Similar price
  8. 49.3%
    Grok 4.6Predecessor
  9. 47.3%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  10. 46.5%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price

+6.7 pts vs Grok 4.6 (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1 as of 2026-09-22. Results are only shown for exact model versions in the official dataset. Official leaderboard.

Reasoning effort

ARC-AGI-2

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

All published scores

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.