GPT-5 launch post cover

Cost/1M tokens

input
$1.25
cached
$0.125
output
$10.00
Context
400Ktokens
Released
1y ago

Benchmarks

DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.

How it ranks

Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.

DeepSWE 1.1

Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1

Arena Text

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #107

  1. 1472
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 1466
    Grok 4.5Similar price
  3. 1446
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  4. 1436
    MiniMax M3Nearby rank
  5. 1436
  6. 1435
    GPT-5
  7. 1435
  8. 1434
  9. 1427
    Mistral Medium 3.5Similar price
  10. 1415
    GPT-4.1Predecessor

+20 vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena WebDev

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #97

  1. 1676
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  2. 1641
    Grok 4.7Similar price
  3. 1434
    MiMo-V2-ProNearby rank
  4. 1420
    GPT-5.2Nearby rank
  5. 1417
    GPT-5
  6. 1414
    InklingNearby rank
  7. 1408
    Inkling SmallNearby rank
  8. 1263
    Mistral Medium 3.5Similar price
  9. 1228
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price

Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Vision

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #87

  1. 1280
    Grok 4.5Similar price
  2. 1263
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  3. 1247
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  4. 1214
  5. 1214
    GPT-4.1Predecessor
  6. 1211
    GPT-5
  7. 1208
    Claude Opus 4Nearby rank
  8. 1208
    Inkling SmallNearby rank
  9. 1199
    Mistral Medium 3.5Similar price

Level with GPT-4.1 (predecessor, overlapping 95% CIs) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Search

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Search yet

Arena Document

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Document yet

Agent Arena

Best IPS score per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Agent Arena yet

ARC-AGI-2

Best score per model · Higher is better

#57 of 85

  1. 83.9%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 67.1%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  3. 60.4%
    Kimi K3Similar price
  4. 11.8%
    Kimi K2.5Nearby rank
  5. 10.3%
  6. 9.9%
    GPT-5
  7. 8.6%
    Claude Opus 4Nearby rank
  8. 6.5%
    o3Nearby rank
  9. 4.9%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  10. 0.4%
    GPT-4.1Predecessor

+9.4 pts vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#13 of 58

  1. 35.6%
  2. 33.4%
    GLM 5.1Similar price
  3. 32.4%
    GPT-5
  4. 32.4%
  5. 31.0%
    GPT-5.1Nearby rank
  6. 14.1%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  7. 10.3%
  8. 5.9%
    Claude Haiku 4.5Similar price
  9. 5.5%
    GPT-4.1Predecessor

+26.9 pts vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#11 of 46

  1. 14.6%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashNearby rank
  2. 14.6%
    Kimi K2.6Nearby rank
  3. 12.5%
    GPT-5
  4. 12.5%
    GPT-5.1Nearby rank
  5. 12.5%
    GLM 5.1Similar price
  6. 4.2%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  7. 2.1%
    Claude Haiku 4.5Similar price
  8. 2.1%
  9. 0.0%
    GPT-4.1Predecessor

+12.5 pts vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 3 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#47 of 72

  1. 80.5%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 34.1%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  3. 31.7%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  4. 22.0%
    Gemini 3.6 FlashNearby rank
  5. 22.0%
    Gemini 3.8 FlashNearby rank
  6. 22.0%
    GPT-5
  7. 19.5%
    GPT-5 ProNearby rank
  8. 17.1%
  9. 0.0%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price

Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#50 of 87

  1. 88.8%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 66.0%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  3. 65.6%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  4. 55.8%
    GPT-5 ProNearby rank
  5. 55.8%
    GLM 5.3 FlashNearby rank
  6. 55.4%
    GPT-5
  7. 54.0%
    Kimi K2.7 CodeNearby rank
  8. 53.0%
    Grok 4.7Nearby rank
  9. 24.6%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  10. 6.0%
    GPT-4.1Predecessor

+49.5 pts vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

GPQA diamond

Best score per model · Higher is better

#64 of 161

  1. 94.0%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  2. 92.3%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  3. 86.9%
    GPT-5.4 MiniNearby rank
  4. 86.4%
  5. 86.2%
    GPT-5
  6. 86.0%
    Claude Opus 4.5Nearby rank
  7. 85.9%
    Claude Fable 5Nearby rank
  8. 85.3%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  9. 66.9%
    GPT-4.1Predecessor
  10. 49.0%
    Mistral Large 2407Similar price

+19.3 pts vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

Humanity's Last Exam

Best score per model · Higher is better

#14 of 34

  1. 46.4%
  2. 46.1%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  3. 30.1%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Nearby rank
  4. 27.8%
    GPT-5.2Nearby rank
  5. 25.3%
    GPT-5
  6. 24.4%
    Kimi K2.5Nearby rank
  7. 23.7%
    GPT-5.1Nearby rank
  8. 21.6%
  9. 7.5%
    Claude Sonnet 4.5Similar price
  10. 5.4%
    GPT-4.1Predecessor

+19.9 pts vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

Best score per model · Higher is better

#52 of 158

  1. 100.0%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  2. 99.2%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  3. 92.2%
  4. 91.4%
  5. 91.4%
    GPT-5
  6. 91.1%
  7. 91.1%
    Qwen3.6 27BNearby rank
  8. 84.7%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  9. 38.3%
    GPT-4.1Predecessor
  10. 8.5%
    Mistral Large 2407Similar price

+53.1 pts vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

SimpleQA Verified

Best score per model · Higher is better

#30 of 87

  1. 66.2%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  2. 56.0%
    Grok 4.7Similar price
  3. 51.7%
    Claude Opus 4.7Nearby rank
  4. 50.6%
    Kimi K3Nearby rank
  5. 50.1%
    GPT-5
  6. 49.4%
    o3Nearby rank
  7. 49.3%
    Grok 4.6Nearby rank
  8. 47.3%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  9. 46.5%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  10. 31.1%
    GPT-4.1Predecessor

+19.0 pts vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

SWE-bench Verified

Best score per model · Higher is better

#20 of 35

  1. 77.3%
    Qwen3.7 MaxSimilar price
  2. 75.2%
    Claude Sonnet 4.6Similar price
  3. 74.2%
    GLM 5.1Similar price
  4. 73.8%
    Kimi K2.5Nearby rank
  5. 73.8%
    GPT-5.2Nearby rank
  6. 73.6%
    GPT-5
  7. 73.3%
    Claude Opus 4.1Nearby rank
  8. 72.9%
  9. 57.6%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  10. 48.5%
    GPT-4.1Predecessor

+25.0 pts vs GPT-4.1 (predecessor) · Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Terminal Bench

Best score per model · Higher is better

#19 of 49

  1. 80.2%
  2. 53.4%
    Claude Sonnet 4.6Similar price
  3. 52.4%
    GLM 5Nearby rank
  4. 49.6%
    GPT-5
  5. 47.6%
    GPT-5.1Nearby rank
  6. 46.5%
  7. 35.5%
    Claude Haiku 4.5Similar price
  8. 32.6%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price

Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1 as of 2026-09-22. Results are only shown for exact model versions in the official dataset. Official leaderboard.

Reasoning effort

ARC-AGI-2

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

GPQA diamond

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

Humanity's Last Exam

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

SWE-bench Verified

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

Terminal Bench

Score by reasoning effort · Higher is better

All published scores

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.