Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Google DeepMind
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 launch post cover

Cost/1M tokens

input
$1.25
cached
$0.125
output
$10.00
cache write
$0.375
Context
1Mtokens
Released
1y ago

Benchmarks

DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.

How it ranks

Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.

DeepSWE 1.1

Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1

Arena Text

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Text yet

Arena WebDev

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena WebDev yet

Arena Vision

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Vision yet

Arena Search

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Search yet

Arena Document

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Document yet

Agent Arena

Best IPS score per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Agent Arena yet

ARC-AGI-2

Best score per model · Higher is better

#78 of 85

  1. 83.9%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 67.1%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  3. 60.4%
    Kimi K3Similar price
  4. 17.6%
    GPT-5.1Similar price
  5. 0.9%
  6. 0.4%
    GPT-4.1Nearby rank
  7. 0.0%
    Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
  8. 0.0%
    Llama 4 MaverickNearby rank
  9. 0.0%
    Llama 4 ScoutNearby rank

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#31 of 58

  1. 33.4%
    GLM 5.1Similar price
  2. 32.4%
    GPT-5Similar price
  3. 31.0%
    GPT-5.1Similar price
  4. 15.2%
  5. 14.1%
    Gemini 2.5 ProNearby rank
  6. 10.3%
    Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
  7. 10.3%
    Qwen3.6 FlashNearby rank
  8. 8.5%
  9. 5.9%
    Claude Haiku 4.5Similar price

Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#32 of 46

  1. 12.5%
    GPT-5Similar price
  2. 12.5%
    GPT-5.1Similar price
  3. 12.5%
    GLM 5.1Similar price
  4. 2.1%
    Qwen3.5 PlusNearby rank
  5. 2.1%
    Claude Haiku 4.5Similar price
  6. 2.1%
    Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
  7. 2.1%
    GPT-5 NanoNearby rank
  8. 2.1%
    o3Nearby rank

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

GPQA diamond

Best score per model · Higher is better

#71 of 161

  1. 94.0%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  2. 92.3%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  3. 87.6%
    GPT-5.1Similar price
  4. 85.3%
    Gemini 2.5 ProNearby rank
  5. 84.8%
    Qwen3.5 PlusNearby rank
  6. 84.8%
    Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
  7. 84.8%
    Qwen3.6 35B A3BNearby rank
  8. 84.2%
  9. 49.0%
    Mistral Large 2407Similar price

Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Humanity's Last Exam

Best score per model · Higher is better

#17 of 34

  1. 46.1%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 25.3%
    GPT-5Similar price
  3. 24.4%
    Kimi K2.5Nearby rank
  4. 23.7%
    GPT-5.1Similar price
  5. 21.6%
    Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
  6. 20.3%
    o3Similar price
  7. 19.4%
    GPT-5 MiniNearby rank

Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1 as of 2026-09-22. Results are only shown for exact model versions in the official dataset. Official leaderboard.

All published scores

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.