GPT-4.1 launch post cover

Cost/1M tokens

input
$2.00
cached
$0.50
output
$8.00
Context
1Mtokens
Released
1y ago

Benchmarks

DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.

How it ranks

Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.

DeepSWE 1.1

Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1

Arena Text

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #147

  1. 1472
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 1466
    Grok 4.5Similar price
  3. 1446
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  4. 1427
    Mistral Medium 3.5Similar price
  5. 1415
    MiniMax M2.7Nearby rank
  6. 1415
  7. 1415
    GPT-4.1
  8. 1414
    Claude Haiku 4.5Nearby rank
  9. 1413
  10. 1336
    GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Earlier version

+79 vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (earlier version) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena WebDev

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena WebDev yet

Arena Vision

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #85

  1. 1280
    Grok 4.5Similar price
  2. 1263
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  3. 1247
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  4. 1215
    Gemini 2.5 FlashNearby rank
  5. 1214
  6. 1214
    GPT-4.1
  7. 1211
    GPT-5Nearby rank
  8. 1208
    Claude Opus 4Nearby rank
  9. 1199
    Mistral Medium 3.5Similar price
  10. 1118
    GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Earlier version

+95 vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (earlier version) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Search

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Search yet

Arena Document

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Document yet

Agent Arena

Best IPS score per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Agent Arena yet

ARC-AGI-2

Best score per model · Higher is better

#77 of 85

  1. 83.9%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 67.1%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  3. 60.4%
    Kimi K3Similar price
  4. 4.9%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  5. 1.1%
    R1 0528Nearby rank
  6. 0.9%
  7. 0.4%
    GPT-4.1
  8. 0.0%
  9. 0.0%
    Llama 4 MaverickNearby rank
  10. 0.0%

+0.4 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#40 of 58

  1. 33.4%
    GLM 5.1Similar price
  2. 32.4%
    Claude Sonnet 4.6Similar price
  3. 14.1%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  4. 10.3%
  5. 6.2%
    Qwen3.5-FlashNearby rank
  6. 5.9%
    Claude Haiku 4.5Nearby rank
  7. 5.5%
    GPT-4.1
  8. 4.8%
    Gemini 2.5 FlashNearby rank
  9. 4.5%
    Claude Opus 4Nearby rank
  10. 0.3%

+5.2 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#39 of 46

  1. 12.5%
    GLM 5.1Similar price
  2. 8.3%
    Claude Sonnet 4.6Similar price
  3. 4.2%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  4. 2.1%
  5. 0.0%
    Claude Sonnet 4Nearby rank
  6. 0.0%
    Kimi K2 ThinkingNearby rank
  7. 0.0%
    GPT-4.1
  8. 0.0%
  9. 0.0%
    Qwen3.5-FlashNearby rank

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#85 of 87

  1. 88.8%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 66.0%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  3. 65.6%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  4. 24.6%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  5. 12.6%
    Claude Opus 4.1Nearby rank
  6. 6.7%
    GPT-4.1 MiniNearby rank
  7. 6.0%
    GPT-4.1
  8. 0.7%
  9. 0.4%
    GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Earlier version

+5.6 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (earlier version) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

GPQA diamond

Best score per model · Higher is better

#113 of 161

  1. 95.6%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 94.0%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  3. 92.3%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  4. 85.3%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  5. 69.4%
    GPT-5 NanoNearby rank
  6. 67.6%
    DeepSeek V3 0324Nearby rank
  7. 66.9%
    GPT-4.1
  8. 65.8%
    GPT-4.1 MiniNearby rank
  9. 65.7%
    Qwen3 32BNearby rank
  10. 47.9%

+19.0 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Humanity's Last Exam

Best score per model · Higher is better

#31 of 34

  1. 46.4%
  2. 46.1%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  3. 21.6%
  4. 7.5%
    Claude Sonnet 4.5Similar price
  5. 5.7%
    Llama 4 MaverickNearby rank
  6. 5.5%
    Claude Sonnet 4Nearby rank
  7. 5.4%
    GPT-4.1
  8. 4.5%
    Mistral Medium 3Nearby rank
  9. 4.1%
  10. 2.7%

+2.7 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

Best score per model · Higher is better

#124 of 158

  1. 100.0%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  2. 100.0%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  3. 99.2%
    Grok 4.6Similar price
  4. 84.7%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  5. 44.7%
    GPT-4.1 MiniNearby rank
  6. 43.9%
  7. 38.3%
    GPT-4.1
  8. 37.8%
    DeepSeek V3 0324Nearby rank
  9. 32.2%
    Mistral Medium 3Nearby rank
  10. 6.3%

+32.1 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

SimpleQA Verified

Best score per model · Higher is better

#65 of 87

  1. 66.2%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashSimilar price
  2. 56.0%
    Grok 4.7Similar price
  3. 47.3%
    Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Similar price
  4. 46.5%
    Claude Sonnet 5.5Similar price
  5. 33.2%
    Grok 4.3Nearby rank
  6. 32.2%
    GLM 4.7Nearby rank
  7. 31.1%
    GPT-4.1
  8. 30.7%
  9. 30.2%
  10. 26.0%
    GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Earlier version

+5.1 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (earlier version) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

SWE-bench Verified

Best score per model · Higher is better

#34 of 35

  1. 77.3%
    Qwen3.7 MaxSimilar price
  2. 75.2%
    Claude Sonnet 4.6Similar price
  3. 74.2%
    GLM 5.1Similar price
  4. 57.9%
    Qwen3.6 PlusNearby rank
  5. 57.6%
    Gemini 2.5 ProSimilar price
  6. 48.5%
    GPT-4.1
  7. 31.0%

+17.6 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor) · Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1 as of 2026-09-22. Results are only shown for exact model versions in the official dataset. Official leaderboard.

All published scores

  • Arena TextArena #1471415

    +79 vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (earlier version)

    • default141595% CI 1411 to 1418 · 50,235 votes
  • Arena VisionArena #851214

    +95 vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (earlier version)

    • default121495% CI 1207 to 1220 · 40,946 votes
  • ARC-AGI-2#77 of 850.4%

    +0.4 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor)

    • default0.4%
    Source:External evaluation via Epoch AIOriginal-source terms apply
  • FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private#40 of 585.5%

    +5.2 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor)

    • default5.5%
  • FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private#39 of 460.0%
    • default0.0%
  • FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private#85 of 876.0%

    +5.6 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (earlier version)

    • default6.0%
  • GPQA diamond#113 of 16166.9%

    +19.0 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor)

    • default66.9%
  • Humanity's Last Exam#31 of 345.4%

    +2.7 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor)

    • default5.4%
    Source:External evaluation via Epoch AIOriginal-source terms apply
  • OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025#124 of 15838.3%

    +32.1 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor)

    • default38.3%
  • SimpleQA Verified#65 of 8731.1%

    +5.1 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (earlier version)

    • default31.1%
  • SWE-bench Verified#34 of 3548.5%

    +17.6 pts vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (predecessor)

    • default48.5%

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.