GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

OpenAI
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) launch post cover

Cost/1M tokens

input
$0.15
cached
$0.075
output
$0.60
Context
128Ktokens
Released
2y ago

Benchmarks

DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.

How it ranks

Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.

DeepSWE 1.1

Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1

Arena Text

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #270

  1. 1452
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price
  2. 1409
    Hy3 previewSimilar price
  3. 1387
    Solar Pro 4Similar price
  4. 1321
    Molmo 2 8BNearby rank
  5. 1318
  6. 1318
    GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
  7. 1318
    gpt-oss-20bNearby rank
  8. 1317
    Gemma 3n E4B ITNearby rank
  9. 1251
    Command R (08-2024)Similar price

Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena WebDev

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena WebDev yet

Arena Vision

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #137

  1. 1265
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price
  2. 1248
    MiMo-V2.6-FlashSimilar price
  3. 1161
    GLM 4.6VSimilar price
  4. 1127
  5. 1118
  6. 1113
    Molmo 2 8BNearby rank
  7. 1097
    GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
  8. 1089
    GPT-4.1 NanoNearby rank
  9. 1045
    Molmo 72BNearby rank

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Search

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Search yet

Arena Document

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Document yet

Agent Arena

Best IPS score per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Agent Arena yet

ARC-AGI-2

Best score per model · Higher is better

#78 of 85

  1. 78.1%
  2. 61.3%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  3. 1.3%
  4. 0.0%
    Llama 4 ScoutSimilar price
  5. 0.0%
    GPT-4.1 NanoNearby rank
  6. 0.0%
  7. 0.0%
    GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#86 of 87

  1. 75.1%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  2. 71.2%
  3. 68.8%
    GLM 5.3Similar price
  4. 20.4%
    Qwen3.6 35B A3BSimilar price
  5. 6.7%
    GPT-4.1 MiniNearby rank
  6. 6.0%
    GPT-4.1Nearby rank
  7. 0.7%
    GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
  8. 0.4%

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

GPQA diamond

Best score per model · Higher is better

#150 of 161

  1. 93.2%
  2. 89.6%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  3. 84.8%
    Qwen3.6 35B A3BSimilar price
  4. 75.8%
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price
  5. 39.5%
    Gemma 3 12BNearby rank
  6. 38.1%
    Claude Haiku 3.5Nearby rank
  7. 37.7%
    GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
  8. 36.5%
    Gemma 2 27BNearby rank
  9. 36.3%
    Claude Haiku 3Nearby rank

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

Best score per model · Higher is better

#142 of 158

  1. 99.4%
  2. 98.9%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  3. 86.7%
    Qwen3.6 35B A3BSimilar price
  4. 73.3%
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price
  5. 7.8%
  6. 7.5%
    Gemma 3 4BNearby rank
  7. 6.9%
    GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
  8. 6.4%
  9. 6.3%

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

SimpleQA Verified

Best score per model · Higher is better

#86 of 87

  1. 42.5%
  2. 41.0%
    GLM 5.3Similar price
  3. 23.8%
    Claude Haiku 5.5Similar price
  4. 11.7%
    GPT-5.4 NanoNearby rank
  5. 10.4%
    Gemma 4 31BSimilar price
  6. 8.3%
    GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
  7. 6.0%
    GPT-4.1 NanoNearby rank

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

Not evaluated in DeepSWE 1.1 as of 2026-09-22. Results are only shown for exact model versions in the official dataset. Official leaderboard.

All published scores

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.