Kimi K2.7 Code launch post cover

Cost/1M tokens

input
$0.60
cached
$0.16
output
$3.50
Context
262Ktokens
Released
5mo ago
Size
1Tparameters

Benchmarks

DeepSWE is the primary coding benchmark where an exact model evaluation exists. Arena leaderboards and other sourced evaluations appear below; missing scores are not zero.

How it ranks

Against its predecessor, similarly priced models and the models ranked around it.

DeepSWE 1.1

Best pass@1 per model · Higher is better

#26 of 28

Arena Text

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Text yet

Arena WebDev

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Arena #77

  1. 1588
    Gemini 3.7 FlashSimilar price
  2. 1581
  3. 1573
    Step 5 PreviewSimilar price
  4. 1482
  5. 1479
    MiMo-V2.5-ProNearby rank
  6. 1474
    Kimi K2.7 Code
  7. 1462
    GPT-5.4Nearby rank
  8. 1461
    Qwen3.6 PlusNearby rank
  9. 1400
    Qwen3.5 397B A17BSimilar price

Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

Arena Vision

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Vision yet

Arena Search

Best Arena rating per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Arena Search yet

Agent Arena

Best IPS score per model · Higher is better

Not ranked on Agent Arena yet

FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#57 of 72

  1. 36.6%
    Gemini 3.7 FlashSimilar price
  2. 26.8%
  3. 26.8%
    Mistral Large 4Similar price
  4. 17.1%
    GLM 5.3 FlashNearby rank
  5. 14.6%
    Grok 4.3Similar price
  6. 12.2%
    Kimi K2.7 Code
  7. 12.2%
    GPT-5 MiniNearby rank
  8. 12.2%
    GPT-5.4 NanoNearby rank

Ahead of 0 of 4 similarly priced models

FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private

Best score per model · Higher is better

#51 of 87

  1. 71.6%
    Gemini 3.7 FlashSimilar price
  2. 64.6%
  3. 55.8%
    GLM 5.3 FlashNearby rank
  4. 55.4%
    GPT-5Nearby rank
  5. 54.0%
    Kimi K2.7 Code
  6. 53.0%
    Grok 4.7Nearby rank
  7. 51.2%
  8. 42.8%
    Grok 4.3Similar price
  9. 31.2%
    Qwen3.5 397B A17BSimilar price

Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

GPQA diamond

Best score per model · Higher is better

#55 of 161

  1. 94.8%
    Gemini 3.7 FlashSimilar price
  2. 91.7%
  3. 88.3%
    InklingNearby rank
  4. 88.1%
    Mistral Large 4Nearby rank
  5. 87.9%
    Kimi K2.7 Code
  6. 87.9%
    Qwen3.7 PlusNearby rank
  7. 87.8%
    GLM 5Similar price
  8. 86.4%
    Qwen3.5 397B A17BSimilar price

Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

Best score per model · Higher is better

#38 of 158

  1. 98.6%
  2. 97.2%
    Gemini 3.7 FlashSimilar price
  3. 95.6%
  4. 95.6%
    Gemini 3.5 FlashNearby rank
  5. 95.6%
    Kimi K2.7 Code
  6. 95.6%
    Qwen3.7 MaxNearby rank
  7. 94.7%
    Claude Sonnet 5Nearby rank
  8. 88.9%
    Qwen3.5 397B A17BSimilar price
  9. 80.0%
    GLM 5Similar price

Ahead of 2 of 4 similarly priced models

SimpleQA Verified

Best score per model · Higher is better

#55 of 87

  1. 69.2%
    Gemini 3.7 FlashSimilar price
  2. 52.9%
  3. 40.4%
  4. 40.3%
    InklingNearby rank
  5. 37.1%
    GPT-5.2Nearby rank
  6. 36.5%
    Kimi K2.7 Code
  7. 35.5%
  8. 34.9%
    Kimi K2.6Nearby rank
  9. 33.2%
    Grok 4.3Similar price

Ahead of 1 of 4 similarly priced models

DeepSWE 1.1

Primary coding-agent benchmark · 113 tasks · Data generated 2026-09-22

Official leaderboard
30.5%
pass@1 · highest published configuration
mini-swe-agent
pass@4
61.1%
Average cost / attempt
$2.82
Benchmark runs
4

pass@1 is the success rate across scored attempts; pass@4 is the share of tasks solved in at least one of four attempts. Costs are reported by DeepSWE for each configuration. These results are not directly comparable to evaluations using different harnesses. Official source JSON.

All published scores

Benchmark compilation: Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (CC BY attribution). Scores are converted to percentages and model names matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog. Individual evaluations are credited to their original sources. External results may carry separate licences and evaluation configurations; do not interpret scores from different harnesses as directly comparable.

Arena ratings: Arena (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), licensed CC BY 4.0. Ratings come from pairwise human votes and are only comparable within one leaderboard; the interval is Arena's 95% confidence interval. Model names are matched to the Vertical Tabs catalog.

To give you the best experience, we use cookies for personalization, insights, and performance. Learn more.